العودة إلى  مدرسة الكمبيوتر     قسم  الصيانة   الصفحة الأولى
Overview and History of the SCSI Interface
SCSI Interface SCSI-1 SCSI-2  SCSI-3 SCSI Adapters Internal-to-external adapters cable FAQ
scsi cables - external SCSI Device Problems
Answers to the Questions : 1   2   3    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13
Page 1
 
Overview and History of the SCSI Interface
 
 
What we currently know of as the SCSI interface had its beginnings back in 1979. Shugart Associates, led by storage industry pioneer Alan Shugart (who was a leader in the development of the floppy disk, and later founded Seagate Technology) created the Shugart Associates Systems Interface (SASI). This very early predecessor of SCSI was very rudimentary in terms of its capabilities, supporting only a limited set of commands compared to even fairly early "true" SCSI, and rather slow signaling speeds of 1.5 Mbytes/second. For its time, SASI was a great idea, since it was the first attempt to define an intelligent storage interface for small computers. The limitations must be considered in light of the era: we are talking about a time when 8" floppy drives were still being commonly used. :^)
 
Shugart wanted to get SASI made into an ANSI standard, presumably to make it more widely-accepted in the industry. In 1981, Shugart Associates teamed up with NCR Corporation, and convinced ANSI to set up a committee to standardize the interface. In 1982, the X3T9.2 technical committee was formed to work on standardizing SASI. A number of changes were made to the interface to widen the command set and improve performance. The name was also changed to SCSI; I don't know the official reason for this, but I suspect that having Shugart Associates' name on the interface would have implied that it was proprietary and not an industry standard. The first "true" SCSI interface standard was published in 1986, and evolutionary changes to the interface have been occurring since that time. (You can read more about SCSI standards here.)
 
It's important to remember that SCSI is, at its heart, a system interface, as the name suggests. It was first developed for hard disks, is still used most for hard disks, and is often compared to IDE/ATA, which is also used primarily for hard disks. For those reasons, SCSI is sometimes thought of as a hard disk interface. (I must admit that placing my SCSI coverage in my own hard disk interfaces section certainly suggests this as well!) However, SCSI is not an interface tied specifically to hard disks. Any type of device can be present on the bus, and the very design of SCSI means that these are "peers" of sorts--though the host adapter is sort of a "first among equals". :^) My point is that SCSI was designed from the ground up to be a high-level, expandable, high-performance interface. For this reason, it is frequently the choice of high-end computer users. It includes many commands and special features, and also supports the highest-performance storage devices.
Of course, these features don't come for free. Most PC systems do not provide native, "built in" support for SCSI the way they do for IDE/ATA, which is one of the key reasons why SCSI isn't nearly as common as IDE/ATA in the PC world. Implementing SCSI on a PC typically involves the purchase of a storage device of course, but also a special card called a host adapter. Special cables and terminators may also be required. All of this means that deciding between SCSI and IDE/ATA is an exercise in tradeoffs.
 
SCSI began as a parallel interface, allowing the connection of devices to a PC or other systems with data being transmitted across multiple data lines. Today, parallel or "regular" SCSI is still the focus of most SCSI users, especially in the PC world. SCSI itself, however, has been broadened greatly in terms of its scope, and now includes a wide variety of related technologies and standards, as defined in the SCSI-3 standard.
 
SCSI Standards
 
There was a time that SCSI standards were relatively few, and not that difficult to understand. That time is now long past. :^) In some ways, the best way I could describe the current situation regarding SCSI standards, feature sets and marketing terms is that it makes the standards and terms associated with IDE/ATA seem simple by comparison. That would really be a rather strong indictment, however, so I won't say that. ;^) Still, understanding all of the documents and labels associated with SCSI can be very baffling at times.
 
It's not that the standards are poorly written, or that the technology is all that hard to understand. The main issue with SCSI today is that it has become so broad, and includes so many different protocols and methods, that it's hard to get a handle on all of it. The confusion surrounding SCSI standards has increased since the creation of SCSI-3, which is really a collection of different standards, some of them rather different from each other. The situation is made worse by manufacturers that like to create funky new "unofficial names" for transfer modes or feature sets, or apply overly-broad labels to specific hardware.
 
As described in the page describing the history of SCSI, the first organization that was charged with developing the first SCSI standard was ANSI technical committee X3T9.2. Today, SCSI standards are developed, maintained and approved by a number of related organizations, each playing a particular role. Here's how they all fit together:
  • American National Standards Institute: ANSI is usually thought of as an organization that develops and maintains standards, but in fact they do neither. They are an oversight and accrediting organization that facilitates and manages the standards development process. As such, they are the "high level management" of the standards world. They qualify other organizations as Standards Developing Organizations or SDOs. ANSI also publishes standards once they have been developed and approved.
  • Information Technology Industry Council: ITIC is a group of several dozen companies in the information technology (computer) industry. ITIC is the SDO approved by ANSI to develop and process standards related to many computer-related topics.
  • National Committee for Information Technology: NCITS is a committee established by ITIC to develop and maintain standards related to the information technology world. NCITS was formerly known under the name "Accredited Standards Committee X3, Information Technology", or more commonly, just "X3". It maintains several sub-committees that develop and maintain standards for various technical subjects.
  • T10 Technical Committee: T10 is the actual technical standards committee responsible for the SCSI interface.
Note: If this description looks similar to the one on the page where I defined the structure of the organizations supporting the T13 technical committee that develops ATA standards, that's because it is. T10 and T13 are sibling committees.
 
If you boil all of this down, T10 is the group that actually does the work of developing new SCSI standards. ;^) The other organizations support their activities. The T10 group is comprised primarily of technical people from various hard disk and other technology companies, but the group (and the development process itself) is open to all interested parties. Comments and opinions on standards under development are welcomed from anyone, not just T10 members. The standards development process is intended to create consensus, to ensure that everyone who will be developing hardware and software agrees on how to implement new technology.
 
Once the T10 group is done with a particular version of a standard, they submit it to NCITS and ANSI for approval. This approval process can take some time; which is why the official standards are usually published several years after the technology they describe is actually implemented. While approval of the standard is underway, companies develop products using technology described in the standard, confident that agreement has already been reached. Meanwhile, the T10 group starts work on the next version of the standard. With SCSI-3 now including a number of different "sub-standards" (hmm, bad name :^) ), it is in some ways constantly "under development".
 
There are also other organizations that are involved in the creation and maintenance of SCSI-related standards. Since SCSI-3 has a broad scope, it defines and structures certain standards that are in fact "owned" by other groups. In particular, the documents describing the physical layer for Fibre Channel are developed by the T11 technical committee, and the IEEE-1394 interface is of course an IEEE standard.
In this section I describe the three main standards that define SCSI. They are listed in chronological order, and SCSI-3 is expanded into its own full section, reflecting its new status as an "umbrella" standard containing several others.
 
Note: Standards that have been approved and published by ANSI are available for purchase in either print form or electronic format from ANSI's web site. Draft standards that are under development (as well as older drafts of approved standards) can be found at the T10 Technical Committee web site.
 
Tip: If there's a SCSI term or "standard" that you are looking for information on but can't find in this section, it might in fact be a transfer mode or feature set.
 
Warning: You may occasionally see a hardware device being sold based on the name of a standard; for example, a "SCSI-3 drive". Be aware that this is a meaningless label, because it is very vague. With the possible exception of SCSI-1, the standards define several different transfer speeds and signaling methods, so just giving the name of a standard is insufficient information to properly describe a SCSI device. With SCSI-3 especially, the label could mean just about anything--always ask for specifics.
 
 طباعة المقال العودة إلى  مدرسة الكمبيوتر     قسم  الصيانة   الصفحة الأولى
Syria
سورية
Amrit
عمريت
أرواد
طرطوس
صور من طرطوس
صور من سورية
للسيدات فقط
معجم الكمبيوتر
أدب وفكر
المجلة الطبية
المعلومات العامة
لمحة عن طرطوس
الموضة النسائية
مدرسة الكمبيوتر
 © 2002-2012 LBCInformation Corporation. All rights reserved م حنا عطا لحود.